Content recommendation engine

What is a recommendation engine? 

Before we talk about content recommendation let us understand what a recommendation engine is. A recommendation engine is a data filtering tool that uses machine learning algorithms to suggest the most relevant content to a certain user or client. It works on the premise of identifying patterns in customer behavior data, which may be gathered either implicitly or explicitly. To give some famous examples,  Netflix‘s movie and programme recommendations are based on a recommendation engine. Amazon, on the other hand, utilizes a recommendation engine to provide product recommendations to its users. While each utilizes one for somewhat different reasons, the end aim is the same: to increase sales, increase engagement and retention, and provide more tailored customer experiences. In the past, a salesman or friends and family would make suggestions. Today, we’ve entrusted this duty to algorithms’ hands, or minds. You might argue that these robots are well-trained in the art of up-selling and cross-selling as a marketing strategy.

Recommendation engines are made feasible by two methodologies: content-based filtering and collaborative filtering (CF). Both methods have advantages and disadvantages, and none is ideal, which is why many high-end manufacturers utilize a “hybrid” engine that blends the two. However, each strategy is effective in achieving a certain purpose; it all relies on the company’s goals, needs, and skills.

Content-Based Filtering: Keywords in Edgewise

The first strategy, content-based filtering, is the more straightforward of the two. It’s built on the idea that items that are connected have keywords in common, which the recommendation engine can look up in the database to identify more stuff with the same keywords. This is in stark contrast to collaborative filtering (discussed in the following section), in which the engine connects or perceives elements in the database as similar based on previous user activity.

Content-based filtering, which is powered by keywords rather than community, avoids the “cold start issue” that plagues CF engines. To begin suggesting, a content-based engine doesn’t need to collect data; all it needs to know is how the organization has pre-classified each item. Furthermore, if keywords are well-researched and original, the engine can consistently deliver relevant material that buyers will enjoy. Changes in incoming data or client behavior are unlikely to lead the engine to propose anything irrational or humiliating (which can be caused by external market forces or cultural trends). Content-based filters are stable and consistent, and suggestions will not change until keywords change.

However, this approach’s lack of dynamism is also a disadvantage. It’s easier to maintain a recommendation engine that isn’t impacted by the activities of the individuals who use it. However, it generates less timely, accurate, and vivid suggestions by default. Everything boils down to keywords using this strategy. A corporation may study and whiteboard its keywords from here to Kalamazoo, attempting to account for every conceivable link one thing could have to others; yet, active users are far more likely to make new and more interesting connections based on their real activity.

Collaborative Filtering

The process of collaborative filtering is based on collecting and evaluating data on user activity. This involves tracking the user’s online behavior and forecasting what they would enjoy based on their shared interests.

The following are two types of collaborative filtering techniques:

  • Collaborative filtering between users
  • Collaborative item-by-item filtering

One of the key advantages of this recommendation system is that it can provide exact recommendations for complicated objects without having to understand the object. There is no reliance on material that can be analyzed by machines.

Recommender systems are software programmes that employ a variety of methodologies to produce and deliver suggestions for objects and other things to users. Hybrid recommender systems integrate two or more recommendation algorithms in a variety of ways to take advantage of their synergistic benefits. The state of the art in hybrid recommender systems over the previous decade is presented in this thorough literature review. It is the first quantitative study devoted only to hybrid recommenders. We discuss the most important issues that have been explored, as well as the data mining and recommendation strategies that have been utilised to solve them. We also look at the hybridization classes that each hybrid recommender falls into, as well as the application areas, the assessment procedure, and future research possibilities. According to our findings, the majority of research weight collaborative filtering with another approach. Cold-start and data sparsity are the two typical and top difficulties addressed in 23 and 22 research, respectively, although majority of the writers continue to employ movies and movie datasets. Providing more reliable and user-oriented assessments remains a common difficulty because most research are appraised by comparisons with similar approaches using accuracy measures. Newer issues, such as reacting to changes in user context, evolving user tastes, and delivering cross-domain suggestions, have also been discovered. Hybrid recommenders, as a popular issue, provide an excellent foundation for responding appropriately by investigating fresh prospects such as contextualizing suggestions, using parallel hybrid algorithms, processing bigger datasets, and so on.

Which Method Is Better?

Recommendation engines are an important arrow in the modern marketer’s and salesperson’s quiver. What is the best method for constructing one? Both content-based and collaborative filtering have advantages and disadvantages, but the transition from one to the other is simple.

Companies may start automating right away using a content-based filtering engine that operates on predetermined keywords, rather than waiting for a community to build data patterns. This level of personalisation can be beneficial if the keywords are excellent. It does, however, prevent unexpected and unique connections from arising between goods and ideas.

Meanwhile, a CF-powered engine will take longer to become operational since its predictive analysis is reliant on user behavior, which must first occur. It also needs more constant monitoring, as fresh data is always arriving. More data, on the other hand, translates to sharper, more engaging, and more diversified suggestions, which is crucial for converting knowledgeable consumers who want deep customisation.

To learn more check out our further blog.